This phrase should be read as an obligation to undergo testing, which is reflected in the prohibition expressed in of the article in question. Since the employer cannot allow an employee to work without current tests, the discussed obligation must be related to the basic obligation, which is to perform work under Art. of the Labor Code An employee who, without justification which was the case in the facts of the case does not submit to control examinations, makes it impossible to perform work, which is clearly classified as a breach of a fundamental obligation.

New wording of the regulations on medical prevention In the provisions of Art. there are new philippines photo editor provisions. The tests referred to in , and are carried out at the employer's expense, subject to. The employer also bears other costs of preventive health care for employees, necessary due to working conditions. NOTE – provision of Art. amended by Art. point letter and the Act of December , Journal of Laws . amending this Act as of February. If an employee sent for initial, periodic or follow-up medical examinations meets the conditions for being covered by a health program or health policy program.



The doctor conducting the initial, periodic or follow-up medical examinations directs the employee, with his or her consent, to participate in the health program. or health policy program. If an employee performs initial, periodic or follow-up medical examinations in accordance with a health program or health policy program, these examinations are financed on the terms specified in the health program or health policy program.